Back to Main Page Psy-Phy PHYSICS #207

 

Diagram

Description automatically generatedMUSEA ISSUE   Psy-Phy PHYSICS  #207

========

This issue of Musea is the "Y" issue, Psy-Phy Physics from a Sci-Fi writer.

Here I present a new paradigm in quantum physics, with lots of speculation gathered over the last two years.  Keep in mind as you read this that 95% of what's here is based on what is known now; and the entire piece is a cohesive concept with most parts connected.

 

Y  --->   e-  +  e+ 

 

This equation states that a photon (Y), can create an electron (e-) , and positron (e+) pair.  That simple statement may explain every aspect of physics! 

 

Two Summaries of this issue:  

Version 1: Physics is either photons or particle pairs.

Version 2: There are two universes.  The first one is photon light energy.  The second one is particle pairs.

 

 

 

1. DIMP stands for dimensionless point - DIM-ensionless P-oint . 

This is a SINGLE POINT outside the universe, that CONTAINS ALL LIGHT!  This is a challenging concept and difficult to even imagine. How can anything, let alone all light energy be in a point without dimension? How can Dimp be outside space and time in a zero point and at the same time everywhere? 

 

Simple answer: It's not part of our Universe, it's part of the speed of light universe! Sounds strange? SURE DOES; but it's based on what we know now!  When you understand my single concept of DIMP, the dimensionless point of light, the rest of these physics ideas fall into place.  So I will try to explain it in a couple of ways. Read, this section carefully! 

 

Dimp the dimensionless point of all light, is a single point that contains all PHOTONS.   

(For visual purposes, think of photons as little pieces of light.) That means Dimp contains all ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY in a single dimensionless point.  That means all light is in a single point, a point that doesn't have four dimensions, or three, or two, or even one! 

 

Pauli's Exclusion Principle is a clue. It says all photons ( a type of boson), can be in one point while their counterpart, fermions, cannot. Remember a PHOTON DOES NOT OCCUPY SPACE! There is no limit to how many can occupy the same quantum state. Photons, all of them, can be in a single point - and they are!!!

 

By definition we know that photons are outside of TIME and DISTANCE.  Infinite time dilation (no time) goes hand in hand with infinite length contraction (no distance to the destination). Because a photon is outside time, it is eternal. Because a photon is outside distance, there is no distance between any photons. They are all together in an eternal point. They share a dimensionless point! That means ALL LIGHT IS IN ONE POINT! 

 

If there is no distance, than photons are everywhere at once - or everywhere at once and back!  That means that the photons in the singularity that STARTED the big bang and our entire universe, are here now today, and will be here forever in the future. 

 

Here's an official quote from Physics.org: From the perspective of a photon, there is no such thing as time... It doesn't experience distance either. 

 

My idea that all light energy is gathered in Dimp, a single dimensionless point, eternal and outside of space-time, is not easy to comprehend. Let's try this visual analogy. Look at photons, not as individual particles or waves of light, but as a quantum ENERGY FIELD that is everywhere at once, a BLANKET OF LIGHT ENERGY that surrounds everything in the universe and is in every part of space time at the same time, a light cloud.  Still with me? 

 

Because Dimp is eternal and outside time; that means Dimp is all of these things: 

Here before the Big Bang, during the Big Bang, and here long after this universe will have ended! It's a vast reservoir of all energy. Our universe, where there is space and time, is a small subset  that broke away from Dimp during the Big Bang, just as an EMBER is a small subset that broke away from a massive BONFIRE. 

 

Dimp was the singularity, the dimensionless point, that the Big Bang exploded out of. That means Dimp is separate from, not only time and distance, but gravity, mass, space, you name it! There is no acceleration in DIMP therefore no gravity!. There is no expansion in DIMP, and no charge. Further the virtually endless amount of energy in Dimp never changes. That is some weird point! 

 

Dimp, the dimensionless point of light, concept seems to help explain all the following separate concepts; COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT, ZERO POINT ENERGY, VIRTUAL PARTICLES, ENTANGLEMENT OR 'SPOOKY ACTION AT A DISTANCE', AND VACUUM ENERGY. 

 

Dimp also means the  electromagnetic force and force of gravity (see later) are not connected. They are separate and can't be unified. 

 

The  simplest way to explain Dimp is to start by saying, there are TWO UNIVERSES:  

THE FIRST UNIVERSE is DIMP, the dimensionless point, or the universe of photons, light, and energy, where everything that is, goes the "speed of light".   

THE SECOND UNIVERSE is a subset of the first called, SPACE - TIME where every thing goes slower than the speed of light. This is the universe of everything that is - BUT photons.  Nothing in Dimp goes slower than the speed of light.  Nothing in Space -Time goes the speed of light.  Does that help clarify? BUT WAIT, it's not quite that simple... 

 

The problem is that to travel at the "speed of light" one has to have both time and distance. But a photon from it's point of view is outside of both time and distance. From our space-time point of view it looks like photons are going a set distance in a set time, but that is our illusion, not their fact. So "speed of light" is a misnomer!  (See below.) 

 

Physics over and over uncovers a dark zone of unexplained and weird phenomenon in the universe. Dimp is that dark zone and may help explain the following:

1. The singularity where the big bang began.

2. Dimp, the dimensionless point of all photons, all light.

3. The dark area in an atom during a quantum jump where the electron instantly jumps over from shell to shell. " Everything in the quantum mechanical universe ... happens in quantum leaps, ... discontinuous transits between quantum states - an electron jumps instantly into another energy level... There is no in between state and it doesn't take anytime for the leap to occur." Moring.

4. The empty zone in an atom where the electron orbital is not.

5. The Two Slit Experiment black bands where no particles/waves land.

6. The nodes of waves where the particle probability is zero.

7.  When two mirror image waves collide, destructive interference occurs which annihilates both waves, and turns them into pure energy. Dimp is that pure energy.

8.  Virtual Particles where particle A and Particle B pop up out of the void, then come together and there is total annihilation.

9.  Quantum tunneling? The space between when Particle A disappears on one side and materializes on the other side.

10. The space between entangled particles where A and  B are strangely and instantly connected no matter the distance between them.

11. Electromagnetic force carriers.

12. The infinities that renormalization tries to fix. With Dimp they are correct as is!

13. Wheeler's Great Smoky Dragon analogy, where A is the head of the dragon, B is the tail of the dragon and the area between is smoke.

14. The 120 orders of magnitude of the vacuum energy density or cosmological constant.

15. Non locality may also be explained by Dimp, which is outside of time and space. 

 

Where is Dimp?  Everywhere that there is vacuum energy or space, or everywhere! That's because any surface not at absolute zero emits photons, and absolute zero can't be reached.  Dimp is OUTSIDE and INSIDE space time! But wait - more weirdness: 

 

PHOTONS DON'T GO ANYWHERE.  Remember the speed of light problem? Photons do not move out of Dimp! If they did they would have time and distance, which they do not!  AND everything in the Universe goes slower than the speed of light.  

 

PHOTONS seem to CONVERT TO ELECTRON - POSITRON PAIRS or DARK ENERGY, when THEY ENTER THE UNIVERSE.  There everything is going slower than the speed of light and the electron positron pairs have mass and are affected by gravity. Photons don't travel they POP!  They pop in at A and then pop out at B, instantly. What looks like photons traveling at the speed of light is more likely TIME DILATION from our point of view Text books say, the only interactions a photon has, are to be created or destroyed. We see a photon being created or destroyed, but nothing in between!  

 

Through pair conversion Dimp sends MESSENGERS: ELECTRON - POSITRON pairs as the energy to do the work . That suggests that electrons and positrons are VEHICLES FOR PHOTON ENERGY!  That means when a photon pops up in our universe, it does so only as an electron / positron pair, and those particle pairs are the energy that does the work! 

 

We know that as an object approaches the speed of light it: becomes heavier and approaches infinite mass, (Infinite mass is also infinite energy,  E=MC2). It contracts in length, and time slows. Could that object keep going faster, it would reach the speed of light and be outside of time and be eternal.  SO if mass could go the speed of light (and it can only approach it) it would be infinite energy with no length in a single dimensionless point, outside of time! Sound familiar? That is DIMP! 

 

Totally confused?  Take a break and try this visual exercise: The light from all stars shine out in every direction with eternal photons that are everywhere all at once. 

Look and see, a web of photons and a blanket of energy, connects all space and all time, now and forever - a net of immortal light!

 

2. MODEL

This model, suggests how everything in our universe was made from PHOTONS, light energy. Photons converted to matter through pair production.  (E=MC2).  

 

Start with the Big Bang that expanded out of Dimp, the dimensionless point. That started pair production that made all the elementary particles, that make up everything else. 

 

PAIR PRODUCTION is when photons (light energy) make matter; usually an ELECTRON, and a POSITRON (anti-electron), pair.  But under certain extreme conditions NEUTRINO and ANTI NEUTRINO pairs, or PROTON and ANTI PROTON pairs. Best example today, on a very small scale is virtual particles. They are an electron and a positron pair that pop up everywhere in space; then almost always immediately annihilate back into energy. 

 

So why didn't the pairs annihilate during the Big Bang too? My suggestion is that space was expanding at such a phenomenal speed, the temperatures were so high, and the electromagnetic field was so strong; that  the particle pairs made by photons; separated in the expanding space, and then re-assembled to become FUNDAMENTAL particles. 

 

So during this first EXTREME phase of the universe, the particle pairs were separated and did not annihilate.  That allowed the BUILDING BLOCKS for our universe.  Best example now is PLASMA, one of the four states of matter where negative and positive particles are separated; or BHABHA SCATTERING where an electron positron pair turn into a photon that turns back into a positron-electron pair; or

ELECTROMAGNETIC SHOWERS, cosmic rays of photons that make positron-electron pairs, that make photons, that make .... etc. 

 

This phase of extremely high temperatures and extremely quick expansion made neutrinos, electrons, and protons; that in turn assembled to make everything else. 

 

PHOTONS from DIMP, CREATED QUANTUM PAIRS that CREATED THE UNIVERSE ! 

 

PHOTONS produced ALL six fundamental particles and anti particle pairs including:

The NEUTRINO  and ANTINEUTRINO.  No charge. 

The ELECTRON - negative charge, POSITRON - positive charge.

The PROTON - positive charge, ANTI PROTON - negative charge. 

 

Next made was the combination particle, the  NEUTRON - no charge. The neutron is not a fundamental particle. This hybrid particle had  either a mix of  proton and electron = no charge, OR a  mix of anti proton and positron = no charge.

My suggestion is that the neutron hybrid could be formed in a way similar to the process of electron capture where a proton + electron = neutron plus emission of a neutrino. 

 

Here are the fundamental pairs made from the Big Bang. 

Charges are:  Positive (+), Negative (-).  

 

Electron (-)  Positron (+)

Proton (+) (-) (+)    Anti Proton (-) (+) (-)

Neutron (+) (-) (+) (-)   Anti Neutron (-) (+) (-)(+) .  

 

The PROTONS and NEUTRONS are made from ELECTRONS and POSITRONS! 

 

When this production of particles was over, most anti particles with charge; positrons, and anti protons, didn't exist on their own. They were LOCKED INTO PROTONS OR NEUTRONS. That way conservation of charge was maintained. That also explains the MISSING ANTI MATTER PROBLEM! 

 

Neutrino (x) Anti Neutrino(x).  Neutrinos have no charge, and are weird, small, fast, extremely light, and confusing. Photons in pair conversions usually make electron and positron pairs: but in certain extreme conditions photons can make a neutrino and anti neutrino pair. They act like  charge-less electrons / positrons that are not fully formed yet. Perhaps they are the first fundamental particles made, OR perhaps reexamining beta decay, neutrinos may not be needed at all, OR perhaps they are something little understood even yet??? 

 

WHAT MY MODEL MAY RESOLVE

Why a proton and electron have the same charge 

Why a positron and proton have the same charge, though the proton is so much larger.

Why the missing anti matter is in the protons and neutrons.

Why neutrons could form from either protons + electrons, or anti protons + positrons.

Why the collective charges in the nucleus never exceed more than one positron for every electron - except in ions.

Why  the strong force may not be needed.

Why there is a proton and electron released in beta minus decay.

Why a proton and electron can form a neutron in a neutron star.

Why a proton needs a neutron in every atom except hydrogen.

Why the neutron tail (the extra negative charge on the neutron) is so important.

Why electron capture.

Why there are so many neutrinos.

Why neutrons have a magnetic moment.

Why neutrons have negative charge on edges but a positive charge between.

Why free protons last forever but free neutrons last about 15 minutes.

Why there are problems with quarks.

Why inflation happened.

How conservation of energy is kept.

How conservation of charge is kept.

Why the singularity was photons, and the force out of the singularity was particle pairs.

Why the production of equal amounts of matter and anti matter didn't annihilate each other; or ...  WHY IS ANYTHING HERE? 

 

SIX PHASES OF THE UNIVERSE: 1. Big Bang, 2. Fundamental Particle Production, 3. Matter building, 4. Acceleration of Space from Dark Energy. 

 

HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE: As more and more matter was clumped together, there was less acceleration and it slowed dark energy expansion. This lasted for the first 7 or 8 billion years. That is now being followed by less new matter production, and more Dark Energy acceleration so the expansion of the universe is speeding up.

 

3. TWO VERSIONS of a SINGLE FORCE or SAME FORCE, TWO UNIVERSES!

Current thinking is that there are four forces, three seem related, the fourth, GRAVITY, does not. This and the next entry tries to resolve that puzzle of physics, and connect RELATIVITY and QUANTUM MECHANICS!  Einstein are you watching? 

 

My suggestion is that instead of the prevailing opinion of four forces, there is only ONE.

BUT, the ONE FORCE  has TWO FORMS!

1. DIMP, the dimensionless point - that is outside our universe.

2. DARK ENERGY that broke out of DIMP, and started the universe we have.  

 

But here is a surprise:  DARK ENERGY is the force that comes from DIMP PHOTONS when they make an ELECTRON POSITRON PAIR.  Dark energy also seems to be vacuum energy the underlying universe background energy, vacuum fluctuations, and virtual particles.  This energy is found everywhere in space, at the same time. Sound familiar? 

 

Therefore, during the Big Bang, Dark Energy broke out of the singularity, Dimp, and started the universe with the first electron positron pair.  But did it explode or TEAR??? 

 

LITTLE TEAR IN SPACE.  DIMP photons, that are outside space-time, made a FIRST PAIR of particles that enter the empty no space and expand it in opposite directions! 

Fact: fermions (electrons and positrons, etc) take up space!  This FIRST TEAR CREATES SPACE, and MAKES a BIT MORE ROOM for more space. 

 

Consider this electron positron pair like the first grain of rice on the CHESS BOARD ANALOGY! The second pair conversion expanded space more or doubled it. Every point of new space made by more pair conversions, allowed more space, that allowed more pair conversions to be created.  The larger the volume of space, the more pair conversions poured into the new universe.  Soon pair conversion was not a single Big Bang event, but an explosion of pair conversions as space ballooned up exponentially. This was an INFLATION of the universe, that may explain the INFLATION concept in physics.  

 

My suggestion is that a better name for this START of the UNIVERSE singularity may be the LITTLE TEAR instead of the BIG BANG! (I will use both in this paper.) 

 

Currently particle pairs annihilate as fast as they are created, MOST OF THE TIME! but their are exceptions even now because we know that DARK ENERGY continues to expand the universe today; and IT'S GOING FASTER! 

 

During the LITTLE TEAR there were these one of a kind conditions: time began, distance began, charge began. Space was expanding at such phenomenal speeds and temperatures were so high, that  the particle pairs made by photons; SEPARATED. Pair conversions made separate ELECTRONS and POSITRONS that did not annihilate. These separate electrons and positrons made up all matter. 

 

Here is a FIRE analogy, There is an ETERNAL FIRE of energy called Dimp.  The Little Tear caused an EMBER, Dark Energy, to break away from that fire and begin to cool! 

 

Here's a strange footnote : TIME HAS SPEED LIMITS!  Time cannot go the speed of light. Time can only go from zero to approaching the speed of light! The closer a particle gets to the speed of light, the slower time becomes!  TIME DILATION!

 

4. GRAVITY, The Force That Never Fit,  or is it DARK ENERGY = ANTI GRAVITY?

 

Which is correct:  GRAVITY is pulling matter together or ANTI GRAVITY, another name for DARK ENERGY, is pushing it together?  Which is correct:  GRAVITY, is inside MATTER somewhere, or ANTI GRAVITY is outside in empty SPACE?   

 

DARK ENERGY in physics is defined as a repulsive force that counteracts gravity and causes the universe to expand everywhere at an accelerating rate.  My suggestion is that DARK ENERGY is ANTI GRAVITY.  My next suggestion is that  ...

THERE IS NO GRAVITY!  

 

The force we call gravity that pulls matter together, is really an opposite acting force called ANTI GRAVITY(or DARK ENERGY, or vacuum energy, or the cosmological constant). This force pushes matter together from outside on all sides. 

 

The previous post, suggested that  the force that expanded out of the LITTLE TEAR and started the universe was DARK ENERGY; and that force was really just a subset of the eternal energy in DIMP, the dimensionless point. 

 

So Gravity from stars and planets was never PULLING matter together.  The opposite was true: Anti Gravity or DARK ENERGY from empty space was expanding and PUSHING matter together from all sides! 

 

My idea is basically a universe wide CASIMIR EFFECT on all matter. Here, instead of two metal plates being drawn together, there are "plates" of matter and the expanding space around them, pushing them together. 

 

FIRST ANALOGY: There are two planets orbiting each other, (Earth and Moon).

The matter of the two planets is not pulling them together, instead, the anti gravity or expanding space around them, is pushing them together from all sides.  

 

The small space between them is pushing them apart too; but it, by itself, is much much weaker than all the expanding space combined that is pushing from all the other sides around them. Though it looks to us observers that GRAVITY between the two is pulling them together: it's the opposite.  It's ANTI GRAVITY / dark energy, and expanding space on all sides that is pushing them together.

 

SECOND ANALOGY.  Start with an EMPTY ROOM  (the entire universe). 

The  WIND, (anti gravity or dark energy) BLOWS LEAVES (matter) INTO the ROOM

The  WIND, (anti gravity or dark energy) KEEPS BLOWING and LEAVES (matter) gradually CLUMP TOGETHER IN A CORNER.

 

THERE IS NO GRAVITY pulling anything together.   THERE IS ONLY ANTI GRAVITY or DARK ENERGY expanding and pushing matter on all sides. This can explain acceleration in elevators, rocket propulsion; the rubber sheet analogy, why no light escapes black holes, space expansion, curvature of space,  even why there is so little gravity in the quantum world.

 

Why is dark energy increasing?  My suggestion is there are two main reasons, 1. the era of matter building is coming to an end in the universe; and 2. as space expands, there is more space for virtual particles to bubble up and expand the universe even more rapidly - a repeating and increasing cycle.

 

5.  WAVE AND WAVE BACK!  

First this is about WAVES / PARTICLES. Then it switches to PULSES.  Remember in physics, waves = particles, and particles = waves.  When I mention one, I mean both.  Remember too, this is the quantum world - very small and very, very strange!

 

WAVES:  Here are some basic ideas about  waves in quantum mechanics. 

Wave / particle duality means that every wave is also a particle. By studying waves instead of particles, I may have uncovered some new concepts.

 

*Map of the UNIVERSE is in every WAVE . (Everything is waves - so wave back!)

*Waves, like particles must somehow display on the crests , troughs, and nodes of the wave:  charge, spin, energy, mass, particle or anti particle - EVERYTHING!

*TWO WAVE UNIVERSE: the entire universe could be made with waves and their mirror image anti waves, mostly electrons and positrons.

*Constructive and destructive interference means that a wave and anti wave or mirror image, annihilate each other in DESTRUCTIVE interference. But exact duplicate waves double the amplitude of the wave in CONSTRUCTIVE interference.

*Particles seem to be subsets of waves, and seldom appear at the nodes of the wave.

*The uncertainty principle is part of any quantum particle with wave like behavior.

*The photon wave seems to be a series of points or PULSES.

*What gives waves speed? Shorter wavelength! That means more alternating crests and troughs equals more energy in less space. They go faster.

*For something to happen two waves have to collide, attract, repel, and or separate.

 

"Photons in pair production can produce a pair of oppositely charged particles. This usually results in an electron-positron pair, a V-shaped trail in which each end of the V spins off in an opposite direction and spirals inward." -  Nova

 

THIS NEXT PART is very SPECULATIVE! 

PHOTONS from the dimp universe, seem to POWER EVERYTHING in our universe by first converting to a POSITIVE - NEGATIVE PAIR of particles. The photon pops up, converts to a positive - negative particle pair that are vehicles for energy that do the work.  Then they annihilate back to a photon after energy is delivered. Photons may NEVER LEAVE DIMP! Instead that pulse of energy converts into a positron / electron pair, that travels through space - time and does the work.  So when you see a photon in a reaction, it's really an electron (-) and a positron (+) in a reaction.

 

Picture, not a ray of light, but a LINE OF PHOTON PULSES that  look like stepping stones.  At each pulse the photon converts to an electron and a positron pair.  The photon shoots out  the pair in opposite directions.  There is a positron crest in one direction, and an electron trough in the other. Where they meet is both the photon and the NODE of the wave.  This  LOOKS like a  SINGLE COMPLETE WAVELENGTH. But it really is quantum fireworks with two energy rockets taking off and curving or spinning in opposite directions at every stepping stone.  

My scenario suggests that each photon wavelength is, a composite of three things, a separate photon at the node in the middle, that shoots out a negative electron trough on one side and a positive positron crest on the other. Look at particle photos and they show visual examples of this pair production.  See each of the two, positron and electron, curve in different directions; such that one flies off in clockwise direction, and the other in counter clockwise direction.  Particle pairs, may be why there are only two charges, negative or positive.

 

Then, even more important, when the stepping stone like PHOTONS line up, they alternate positive crests with negative troughs.  These interact such that different charges attract, and like charges repel THIS MAY BE A CLUE TO HOW WAVES MOVE with these two possible scenarios:

 

1. Positive crest, pushes a negative trough, pushes a positive crest, pushes a negative trough and so forth. So photon waves are energy engines with alternating POSITIVE charged CRESTS and NEGATIVE charged TROUGHS. These alternating charges from crest , across the nodes of the wave, to trough, powers each wave forward, like alternating PISTONS in an engine.  OR

2.  The photon converts to a series of pulses of electrons and positrons that, at each step immediately annihilate and turn to energy that powers the wave forward.

 

DIRECTION COUNTS? Photos show that when a photon makes an electron positron pair - they both fly off in opposite directions with one spinning clockwise, and the other spinning counter clockwise. This looks somewhat like the letter "Y" or "V" with the two top ends in opposite spinning spirals. 

That suggests that just maybe ELECTRONS are a series of spinning pulses all spinning in a clockwise direction.  AND POSITRONS are a series of spinning pulses, all spinning in a counter clockwise direction. (Each could go the other way, but whatever it is, it's always opposite.)

 

Clearly electrons and positrons are key fundamental particles. They were mostly made and separated from each other, in the Big Bang/ Little Tear. Both may be strings of pulses of only one charge. Neither has BOTH alternating crests and troughs of opposite charge like the PHOTON does. Each is MISSING something. The electron has all NEGATIVE charged pulses spinning in the same direction.  The positron has all POSITIVE charged pulses spinning in the other direction.  That means that the electron is missing the ingredient from the positron to give it full energy like photons; and the positron is missing the ingredient from the electron to give it full energy. Photons have alternating charges, electrons have only negative, and positrons only positive.  That would suggest that the electron spinning pulses are ATTRACTED to the positron spinning pulses, to supply the other half of their energy.  This is exactly what happens when an electron and positron merge - they ANNIHILATE back to photons and pure energy. That would explain what charge is -  the electrons and positron are half photons, and half energy, that miss their other half.  That attraction, to be completed, would draw them together. That attraction is CHARGE.  POSITIVE attracts NEGATIVE!

 

MORE SPECULATION:  When you imagine a spinning electron (or positron) with it's single charge - you clearly see that it would spin into a tighter and tighter ball of energy. Does that concentrated ball of energy play a part in quantum physics? 

 

Besides electrons and positrons there are two other fundamental particles, protons and neutrinos plus one more building block, neutrons.

PROTON is a stable hybrid of two positrons and one electron in between.  This gives the proton a plus, minus, plus, makeup. Add those up to get an overall charge of plus one. Far as we know now, protons are so stable they are indivisible and immortal!

NEUTRON is an unstable hybrid of two positrons and two electrons that alternate This gives the neutron a plus, minus, plus, minus makeup, and its overall charge of zero. OR a NEUTRON IS ONE PROTON CONNECTED TO ONE ELECTRON! 

The neutron lasts about 10 minutes outside of the nucleus and quickly breaks down in beta minus decay, to a PROTON, an ELECTRON, and an antineutrino. 

NEUTRINO.  Best guess that this quirky very very little thing is an electron or positron but without charge. With no charge to make it spin, either way; it just  might shoot out as an almost straight wave!  OR it's just a bit of weird unexplained energy!?!

 

6.  Furthermore ...

WHAT MAY NO LONGER BE NEEDED IN PHYSICS

Renormalization / gravity and gravitons / gluons / strong force / quarks, / cosmic constant problem / missing mass problem / Higg's Field / zoo of particles in the standard model / string theory / TOE (theory of everything).

 

SOME QUESTIONS LEFT

Why is the proton so stable, and why is an alpha particle or helium nucleus, so stable.

What is spin? Why just two types. What is its connection to charge?

What is entanglement?  Why is it connected to spin?

What is dark matter? Best guess, it's virtual particles before annihilation, like the entire universe breathing in and out!

Why did the Big Bang start? How did it start?

Why does current flow from positive to negative, or does it?

What is on the other side of absolute zero?

 

OFFBEAT SPECULATION

*There is a DARK ZONE  (DIMP?)that may be all these things: black stripes in the two slit experiment / the node of all quantum waves / the space leaped over in a quantum jump / virtual particles/ and  vacuum energy.

*How does approaching the speed of light affect the Casimir Effect?

*Rubber Sheet analogy without mass!

*Quarks are weird (if true.)

*Pre Big Bang and post universe???

*Compare the ratios: dark energy 70%,  dark matter 25%  WITH  hydrogen 73% of the universe, helium 27% of the universe.

*The energy of a photon is inversely proportional to the wavelength. Now take a wavelength to it's ultimate - a single line, a point, a pulse. Can anything go faster or be more straight?

*The universe ends as every wave stretches out, to a straight line, due to dark energy.

*Conservation of energy says that it is never created or destroyed - maybe YES because energy never moves out of DIMP? Instead only particle pairs do; or maybe NO and dark energy increases amount of energy in our space-time. But does that increase have an end point?

*The entire universe is just a black hole in dimp. Virtual particles are the event horizon.

*Could there be other subset universes that came out of dimp.

*If there are not equal amounts of electrons and positrons, we are not here!

*Did the inflation epoch stretch all the waves in the universe as it expanded rapidly?

*Non locality - no such thing as place or distance / everything tied together in an entangled universe!

*Backwards in time, mixed with forward in time = NOW!!!  Positron goes backward in time, electron goes forward. Does that make the original photon now-time such that

positron past + electron future = photon now!  OR Positron and electron the same thing in different directions?

 

*MAGNET .  First I started with a drawing of a photon that converted to a positron electron pair in a "V" shape.  Each charge shot off in opposite directions and opposite spin. Then I drew a rectangle around it = BAR MAGNET!

Q.  Why don't the two ends of a bar magnet, meet in the middle and annihilate each other? If plus attracts minus, why doesn't the charge of a magnet meet in the middle and annihilate?

Q.  Why do the magnetic lines circle round the center of a bar magnet?  

Q.  We know the center has less charge or zero charge, so what's in the center? An annihilation zone?  Photons?  Both?

Q Why would photons be in the middle?  Do they generate the charged particles at each end of the magnet, or are they the result of annihilation of charged particles that meet in the middle of the magnet.

This may help explain why there cannot be a MONOPOLE - because a photon has to be in the center to produce and power both charges at the same time.

 

*SHELLS IN ATOM ALTERNATE DIRECTION

Fact - two parallel wires carrying current, attract or repel according to direction.

Same direction = attract;  opposite direction = repel. Could that idea transfer to an atom with each electron shell in an atom going in an opposite direction to the one before it?

First shell with it's two electrons, goes clockwise,  2nd counter clockwise, 3rd clockwise, etc.  So, going further, could electrons be particles going in one direction and positrons in the other???

 

*NATURAL SELECTION IN SPACE TIME 

The Big Bang / Little Tear singularity at it's highest temperature and energy, produced a ZOO OF PAIRS OF PARTICLE WAVES. When temperatures dropped and expansion slowed down, this production stopped. 

So which ones lasted? Like minded waves,  waves that somehow interacted with other wavelengths, were more likely to form atoms, molecules, etc. such as electrons, protons, and neutrons. Those that were neutral didn't react with anything such as neutrinos.  The rest  of the wave particles were short lived and decayed or were annihilated with mirror image waves. That may be important clues to every aspect of physics;  NATURAL SELECTION in physics or QUANTUM SELECTION. 

 

*TEMPERATURE. 

A remarkable feature of the Big Bang - Little Tear Universe, is that  temperature determines the relative abundance of energy and matter.  Seems reasonable that the Big Bang froze matter wave particles at certain temperatures as the universe cooled?  What are those temperatures, and why those?

 

QUOTES

Q. "I think I've just seen how the universe works!"...

Q. We're entering a state of much more sophisticated confusion - Christopher Stubbs.

Q. Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. - Albert Einstein

Q.  To be sure all these theories are speculative; but speculation is as important a part of science as observation and experiment." - Richard Morris.

Q. The missing pieces may already be out there awaiting (someone) to pull them together.  It may also take some entirely new idea or the recognition that some old idea is subtly flawed -  George Musser.

Q. A thousand mistakes, or one simple concept?

Q. Can't fill in the details - no one can at this time.

 

Special thanks to John H. Chalmers for his "cantankerous" help over these years.

 

Musea #207, "Y", the Psy Phy Physics from a Sci-Fi Writer, Issue.  

(c) 2022 Tom Hendricks 

tom-hendricks@att.net

Main website: TomHendricks.US